Speak only with
your lawyer.

An Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP) can be issued when police allege that a driver failed or refused, without reasonable excuse, to provide a roadside breath sample. A refusal can result in an immediate 90-day driving prohibition, vehicle impoundment, monetary penalties, and other reinstatement consequences. The deadline to dispute an IRP is very short — generally 7 days to apply for a review — and filing a review does not automatically let the person keep driving.

In refusal cases, important issues may include whether the officer made a lawful demand, whether the driver actually refused, whether there was a reasonable excuse, whether the paperwork was completed properly, and whether police complied with the Motor Vehicle Act. These cases move quickly, so legal advice should be sought immediately after the prohibition is served.

A peace bond is a court order requiring a person to keep the peace and follow conditions. It is not the same as pleading guilty to a criminal offence, and entering into a peace bond does not create a criminal conviction. However, the order can still have serious practical consequences.

Conditions may include no-contact terms, no-go areas, weapons restrictions, counselling-related terms, or other restrictions the court considers appropriate. A peace bond can last up to 12 months in the ordinary case, and breaching one can lead to a separate criminal charge — so the conditions should be reviewed carefully before anything is agreed to and signed.

Assault with a weapon is a Criminal Code offence. It can apply where a person commits an assault while carrying, using, or threatening to use a weapon or imitation weapon. A “weapon” does not always mean a firearm or knife; depending on how it is used, an ordinary object may be alleged to be a weapon.

The Crown must prove the offence beyond a reasonable doubt. Issues may include identity, whether force was intentionally applied, whether there was consent in law, whether the object was actually used or threatened as a weapon, self-defence, witness reliability, and whether the evidence supports a lesser offence. It is a serious charge that can carry significant sentencing, bail, employment, travel, firearm, and immigration consequences.

Driving while prohibited is a separate offence under the BC Motor Vehicle Act. The Crown usually must prove that the person drove on a highway or industrial road while knowing they were prohibited from driving.

A first conviction can result in a fine of $500 to $2,000, jail for up to 6 months, or both. For a subsequent conviction, the Motor Vehicle Act provides for a fine and a mandatory minimum jail sentence of 14 days. Common issues include whether the prohibition was valid, whether the person knew about it, whether proper notice was given, whether the person was actually driving, and whether the location falls within the legislation.

Permanent residents are not automatically protected from immigration consequences simply because they already hold PR status. Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, a permanent resident can become inadmissible for “serious criminality” in several circumstances — including where the offence is punishable by a maximum term of at least 10 years, or where a sentence of more than 6 months is imposed.

The sentence can be just as important as the charge itself. In some cases a permanent resident may have a right to appeal a removal order to the Immigration Appeal Division, but that appeal right can be lost if the person is found inadmissible for serious criminality and was punished in Canada by a term of imprisonment of at least 6 months. Charges involving permanent residents should be assessed with immigration consequences in mind before any plea or sentencing position is finalized.

Cell phones contain highly private information. Police generally need lawful authority to search a phone, and the legality of a search depends on the circumstances. A limited search incident to arrest may sometimes be allowed, but it must be genuinely connected to the arrest and properly limited.

School searches can raise different issues. Students still have privacy rights, but the school context can affect the legal analysis, especially where a search is conducted by school staff for safety or disciplinary reasons. Police involvement, random searches, phone passwords, screenshots, deleted messages, and consent all require scrutiny. A youth or student should not assume that every request to hand over or unlock a phone is legally valid.

A first appearance at Surrey Provincial Court is usually not the trial. In most criminal cases it is an administrative court date where the court confirms the charge, the accused's attendance, whether disclosure has been received, whether counsel has been retained, and what the next step should be.

The matter may be adjourned so the accused can review disclosure, get legal advice, apply for Legal Aid, or have counsel contact Crown. Depending on the charge and stage, later steps may include plea discussions, election and plea, a judicial case manager appearance, or a trial-fixing date. The accused should attend unless specifically excused, because missing court can lead to a warrant or further charges.